The letter initiates the process of broadening the Patriot Act and domestic terrorism laws to target individuals who resist fossil fuel infrastructure. However, the accusation of terrorism is based on a misrepresentation, as violence against human beings has never been a part of the climate movement’s agenda. The only violent reference cited in the letter is a misinterpretation of a letter to the editor published in a local newspaper in Boulder, Colorado. This attempt to defame the climate movement and suppress dissent is unfounded and seeks to undermine free speech.

Contrary to the claims made by the fossil fuel industry-backed Representatives, anti-pipeline activists have not engaged in violent acts such as burning holes in active pipelines or tampering with pipeline pump stations. The climate movement has consistently employed nonviolent tactics, including marches, disruptions of fossil fuel infrastructure construction, and blockades of coal trains and ships, with the aim of protecting life and averting climate catastrophe.

The letter’s proponents, influenced by significant financial contributions from the fossil fuel industry, prioritize short-term profits over addressing the urgent threat of climate change. Representative Ken Buck (R-CO), who initiated the letter, received substantial campaign contributions from the oil and gas industry during his 2016 re-election campaign. If successful, the expansion of domestic terrorism laws could lead to activists facing life imprisonment under “terrorist enhancement” labels, subjecting them to conditions tantamount to torture.

It is imperative to resist this legislative agenda that seeks to persecute activists and stifle dissent. The United States government’s close ties to the fossil fuel industry, coupled with its failure to adequately address climate change, highlight the urgent need for grassroots movements and nonviolent direct action to effect meaningful change. With traditional avenues of legislative advocacy compromised by industry influence, activists must look to alternative strategies to reclaim government accountability and ensure a just and livable future for all.

The post Fossil Fuel Congress Asks Jeff Sessions To Label Climate Action “Terrorism” appeared first on Timdechristopher.

The action aimed to draw attention to how projects like the West Roxbury Lateral contribute to deadly global climate change by further entrenching reliance on fossil fuels. As evidence mounts regarding the high rates of leaked methane from fracking and gas pipelines, the climate movement has intensified its resistance to new fracked gas projects.

Among those lying in the trench was Karenna Gore, director of the Center for Earth Ethics at Union Theological Seminary and daughter of former Vice President Al Gore. Also participating was Tim DeChristopher, known as Bidder 70 for disrupting a government oil and gas lease auction in 2008, resulting in 21 months of federal prison.

“This pipeline trench is our anticipatory mass grave in the age of climate crisis,” stated Tim DeChristopher during a speech before his arrest.

Many of the clergy involved had previously taken action on May 25, when 16 faith leaders led a prayer service at the pipeline trench, resulting in arrests for trespassing and disturbing the peace.

“As religious leaders, we are compelled to take bold non-violent action in the face of climate crisis,” said Rabbi Shoshana Meira Friedman of Temple Sinai.

Despite opposition from Boston city officials, including Mayor Marty Walsh, and federal representatives, construction of the West Roxbury Lateral pipeline continues under authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Concerned citizens, represented by Resist the Pipeline & Stop the West Roxbury Lateral (SWRL), are attempting to halt construction before it reaches the Metering and Regulating station, located near the West Roxbury Crushed Stone Co. quarry. Residents are concerned about the seismic impact of both the pipeline and quarry blasts on their homes and safety.

The ongoing resistance underscores the urgent need to transition away from fossil fuels and toward renewable energy sources to mitigate the impacts of climate change and protect communities from environmental hazards.

The post Press Release: Symbolic Climate Mass Grave Funeral to #StopSpectra appeared first on Timdechristopher.

During the jury selection process, it became evident that many potential jurors had received pamphlets from the Fully Informed Jurors Association, discussing jurors’ rights to use their consciences when making decisions. This revelation sparked panic from the lead prosecutor, who demanded a mistrial, fearing that jurors might exercise their rights to disagree with the government’s stance.

The lead prosecutor’s reaction highlighted the fear of empowered citizens within the legal system. Despite the government’s confidence in securing a conviction in the case, the prosecutor was unnerved by the prospect of jurors asserting their moral agency. This fear was compounded by the judge’s instructions to potential jurors, emphasizing obedience to legal instructions over moral considerations.

The prosecutor’s apprehension subsided once the potential jurors reaffirmed their willingness to follow legal instructions, even if they believed them to be morally wrong. This demonstrated how individuals could relinquish their moral agency in deference to authority figures, paving the way for convictions that may go against their personal beliefs.

Obama’s appointment of John Huber as US Attorney for Utah raises concerns about the government’s stance on citizen empowerment and dissent. Huber’s philosophy of being the “hammer” instead of the “nail” reflects a troubling trend toward authoritarianism within the legal system.

The broader implications of Huber’s appointment extend beyond partisan politics, highlighting the erosion of democratic principles and the marginalization of citizen voices in the legal process. As climate chaos looms and societal tensions escalate, the need for engaged and empowered citizens becomes more critical than ever.

Ultimately, the power of solidarity and moral agency among citizens remains a potent force against authoritarianism and injustice. Huber’s appointment serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle for democratic values and the importance of preserving citizens’ rights to dissent and conscience.

The post John Huber, Obama’s New Hammer appeared first on Timdechristopher.

I am personally looking forward to presenting our case to a jury comprised of ordinary citizens who will have the opportunity to assess whether our actions were justified. We believe that our government has failed to adequately address the threat posed by Spectra’s activities in West Roxbury and their detrimental impact on our global climate. Despite opposition from every elected official representing West Roxbury, the project has proceeded, compelling us to engage in civil disobedience to safeguard our communities.

The excavation taking place is not merely for a pipeline trench; it symbolizes a mass grave. In an era marked by the anticipation of mass graves, we recognize that each new fossil fuel project commits us to burning fossil fuels for decades, leading to further devastation worldwide. Therefore, our resistance is a necessary response to protect both our local community and the planet as a whole.

The post Court Appearance and Planning for Mass Grave 6 Trial appeared first on Timdechristopher.

Then, a decade ago, Hurricane Katrina provided that stark depiction in unmistakably human terms. The imagery that emerged was of black individuals stranded on rooftops. Given that marginalized communities, including poor and people of color, disproportionately bear the brunt of the climate crisis, this imagery is likely to remain an accurate representation of its human impact.

Yet, even after witnessing the human toll of climate change through the lens of Hurricane Katrina, our society failed to mobilize effectively to address the crisis and prevent the recurrence of such suffering. If climate change meant that black lives were at risk, then it seemed that black lives did not matter enough to prompt action. Undoubtedly, there are numerous barriers to galvanizing political and public will to combat climate change. However, the lesson from ten years ago was that one of these barriers is deeply ingrained racism in the United States.

For many in the predominantly white climate movement, Katrina served as a turning point towards a paradigm of climate justice and an acknowledgment of the link between the climate crisis and white supremacy. Katrina marked a pivotal moment in the grassroots shift from advocating for a cleaner, greener status quo to advocating for collective liberation from interconnected forms of oppression. With a crisis that disproportionately impacts marginalized communities and solutions that often challenge the interests of the wealthy and powerful, it became evident that fighting climate change necessitates simultaneously addressing other forms of injustice.

Over the past decade, the climate justice movement has made significant strides in forging relationships and alliances with other social justice movements. Admittedly, navigating these relationships has at times been challenging, given the historical dominance of white, middle-class perspectives within the environmental movement. Nevertheless, considerable progress has been achieved, particularly among younger activists. Many young climate activists reject single-issue environmentalism, viewing intersectional justice as foundational to their activism. The lesson learned from Katrina is clear: the path to climate justice intersects with racial justice.

The post A Lesson from Katrina appeared first on Timdechristopher.

In the event that the courts fail to uphold the people’s right to protect their community from corporate activities endangering their well-being, the newly enacted ordinance empowers individuals to enforce the Township’s Charter through nonviolent direct action. Moreover, the law explicitly shields participants in nonviolent direct action from facing criminal charges or civil actions initiated by private or public entities.

Stacy Long, a Supervisor in Grant Township, expressed frustration with corporations and regulatory agencies dismissing the community’s concerns about the proposed injection well. “We’re tired of being told that we can’t stop this injection well,” Long stated. “As elected officials, we are committed to safeguarding the health and safety of our Township residents, and we will do whatever it takes to resist threats posed by companies like PGE.”

The controversy surrounding the injection well dates back to 2013 when residents discovered PGE’s plans to obtain permits for the project. Despite opposition voiced through hearings, public comments, and permit appeals, the federal Environmental Protection Agency granted PGE a permit. In response, residents turned to the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF) for assistance.

In June 2014, with strong community support, Grant Township passed a Community Bill of Rights ordinance drafted by CELDF, asserting rights to clean air and water, local community self-government, and the rights of nature. This ordinance effectively prohibited the proposed injection well as a violation of these rights. However, PGE promptly filed a lawsuit against the Township, claiming a “right” to inject within its boundaries.

Despite legal challenges, the Township remained steadfast in its commitment to protect its residents. In November 2015, residents voted to adopt a new Home Rule Charter, reinstating the ban on injection wells by a significant majority. CELDF has been instrumental in drafting the Charter and representing the Township in its ongoing legal battle with PGE.

Jon Perry, another Supervisor in Grant Township, emphasized the importance of community rights in the face of corporate interests. “Sides need to be picked,” Perry stated. “Should a polluting corporation have the right to inject toxic waste, or should a community have the right to protect itself?”

Support for Grant Township’s stance is growing, with individuals like Tim DeChristopher from the Climate Disobedience Center expressing solidarity. CELDF community organizer Chad Nicholson commended the Township for asserting its rights and standing up against unjust laws, drawing parallels to historical movements for justice and equality.

As the legal battle continues, Grant Township remains resolute in its determination to defend its community and its Charter, inviting others to stand alongside them in their fight against corporate encroachment.

The post PA Township Legalizes Civil Disobedience appeared first on Timdechristopher.

One fundamental problem with the promotion of nuclear power is the issue of democracy. While proponents argue that nuclear energy can be safely managed, the reality is that safety can be compromised to maximize corporate profits. Without robust government regulation and oversight, there is a significant risk of cutting corners that could lead to catastrophic consequences. Our current governing structures, influenced by corporate interests and lacking accountability, are ill-equipped to handle the responsibility of nuclear power.

Moreover, local democracy is crucial in discussions about nuclear power. The regulatory hurdles and safety standards in place rightly pose challenges to the rapid expansion of nuclear energy. Fast-tracking new nuclear plants would trample on the rights of communities, particularly those already marginalized. It is often the most vulnerable communities that bear the brunt of the negative impacts of nuclear energy, from uranium mining to waste storage. Unlike solar energy, which can be decentralized and integrated into communities, nuclear power plants require massive disruption and displacement.

Contrary to claims that nuclear power lacks subsidies, historical data reveals substantial government support for the industry. Large subsidies, such as the $8.3 billion given to a single nuclear plant in Georgia in 2010, highlight the significant financial backing nuclear energy receives. Despite these subsidies, nuclear growth has remained stagnant for decades, underscoring the flawed economic model of centralized energy production.

Additionally, discussions about nuclear power cannot be divorced from the crisis of income inequality. Nuclear energy perpetuates a centralized economic model similar to the fossil fuel industry, concentrating wealth and power in the hands of a few. Unlike renewables, which decentralize energy production and empower communities, nuclear power reinforces existing inequalities.

Furthermore, in the context of climate change, relying solely on nuclear power is risky. As climate uncertainty increases, diversity in energy sources becomes crucial for resilience. Nuclear power’s massive upfront investment and long-term management requirements make it a precarious bet in an unpredictable future. With rising sea levels and water shortages exacerbated by climate change, the feasibility of nuclear power near shorelines or inland is questionable.

Ultimately, realistic solutions to the climate crisis require acknowledging the limitations of our current consumption patterns and rejecting the notion of techno-fixes as a panacea. Instead of gambling with high-risk nuclear energy, we must prioritize sustainable and diversified energy sources while addressing systemic issues of inequality and corporate influence in governance.

The post Nuclear Is Not the Answer appeared first on Timdechristopher.

However, upon watching the video of Sanders’ response to the protest, my perspective shifted. Instead of engaging with the protesters, Sanders seemed to speak over them, continuing with his prepared remarks. His dismissive attitude and failure to address their concerns directly left me unsettled.

The activists from Black Lives Matter, as black women, have historically been marginalized and excluded from public discourse. Their decision to speak out, even if it disrupted the event, was an assertion of their right to be heard. It was a stark reminder that despite Sanders’ platform advocating for ordinary citizens’ voices to be heard, he failed to recognize and engage with those voices when they were right in front of him.

Personally, the value of the protest lay in what it revealed about Sanders’ response and, by extension, my own perspective. Sanders’ tendency to focus on structural issues, like economic inequality, rather than addressing specific instances of racism, reflected a broader trend in how many of us approach anti-racism efforts.

However, the protest was a poignant reminder that addressing systemic issues alone is not enough. The specific case of Sandra Bland, who had a job but still fell victim to police violence, highlights the intersection of race and economic opportunity. Sanders’ failure to acknowledge this intersection in his response underscored a blind spot in his campaign’s approach to racial justice.

Moving forward, Sanders has the opportunity to learn from this experience and demonstrate a genuine commitment to addressing racial inequality. Embracing the energy and grassroots organizing of the Black Lives Matter movement could strengthen his campaign and ultimately make him a more effective leader in combating racism as president.

The protest also served as a wake-up call for individuals like myself who may tend to prioritize systemic analysis over acknowledging the lived experiences of those facing oppression. It highlighted the importance of listening to and amplifying the voices of marginalized communities, even if it means disrupting established narratives or agendas.

While some may argue that these lessons could have been imparted through less disruptive means, the reality is that marginalized voices are often excluded from mainstream discourse. Protests provide a platform for those voices to be heard and challenge the status quo. In a society where agendas are often set by those in power, protest serves as a vital tool for marginalized communities to assert their presence and demand change.

The post The Value of Protest appeared first on Timdechristopher.

In recent weeks, the climate movement in the United States has achieved unprecedented victories against the fossil fuel industry. Campaigns like #ShellNo and resistance against the Keystone XL pipeline have demonstrated the power of grassroots activism. Additionally, significant legislative and legal actions have been taken, including the introduction of a real climate bill in the Senate and subpoenas issued to Exxon for misleading information about climate change.

Despite these victories, there is a stark contrast in access to the climate negotiations between fossil fuel lobbyists and climate activists. While the industry has direct influence on the process, the voices of activists are being suppressed. Calls to remove fossil fuel representatives from the talks have been largely ignored, highlighting a concerning power imbalance.

In response to attempts to limit protests and public participation, the climate movement must stand firm and continue to demonstrate its commitment to action. Rather than acquiescing to repression, activists should amplify their demands and take to the streets in even greater numbers. The decision to restrict public participation only underscores the urgency of the climate crisis and the need for bold action.

This is a critical moment for the climate movement, with significant progress being made against formidable opposition. It is essential that activists maintain their momentum and refuse to be silenced. As the future of our planet hangs in the balance, we cannot afford to back down. Now is the time to show courage and determination in the face of adversity.

The post Climate Movement, Don’t Back Down at Paris #COP21 appeared first on Timdechristopher.

Chait’s narrative revolves around the failure of Obama’s cap-and-trade bill in 2010, which he portrays as the pivotal moment when environmentalists supposedly gave up on the fight against climate change. However, this overlooks the fact that the cap-and-trade bill was unrelated to the Copenhagen agreement’s goal of limiting global temperature rise to 2 degrees Celsius. Moreover, Chait’s characterization of activists as “environmentalists” demonstrates his ignorance of the vibrant climate justice movement that has been steadily growing since 2010.

Contrary to Chait’s claims of activist apathy, the past decade has seen a surge in grassroots resistance against fossil fuel projects across the country. From the massive protests in New York City, where 400,000 people marched for climate action, to the successful closure of 200 coal plants due to local activism, it is clear that the fight against climate change is far from over. This resistance has often clashed with the policies of the Obama administration, including its support for offshore drilling and Arctic drilling in the Pacific Northwest.

One of the most notable examples of grassroots activism was the battle over the Keystone XL pipeline, which saw over 1,200 activists arrested outside the White House in 2011. Despite Chait’s portrayal of Obama as a climate savior, it was grassroots pressure that pushed the administration to reconsider its support for the pipeline. Activists with organizations like 350.org played a crucial role in holding Obama accountable for his climate policies, demonstrating that real change comes from the bottom up.

Chait’s attempt to paint a rosy picture of climate action under the Obama administration is not only misleading but also dangerous. By promoting complacency and downplaying the role of grassroots activism, he undermines the urgency of the climate crisis. Despair, as Chait suggests, does not render us passive; instead, it fuels our determination to fight for climate justice.

Many activists, myself included, have experienced moments of despair in the face of the climate crisis. However, our hope is not dependent on optimism but on our deep love for the planet and its inhabitants. It is this love that drives us to continue the struggle for a sustainable future, regardless of the challenges we may face. So, while Chait may dismiss our efforts as futile, we will not waver in our commitment to protecting the world we cherish.

The post Sunny Climate Nonsense appeared first on Timdechristopher.